Hypotheses we want to test

Charlotte Lamb

Throughout this project, the MBL team want to test several hypotheses. We’ll be checking in on these regularly.

  • Working in the open leads to more shared knowledge, building collective value, project legacy, transparency and accountability.
  • – Does working in the open help or hinder effective decision-making? ​
    – When does working in the open help? When does working in the open hinder? ​

  • For true collaboration you must give up power and/or control.
  • – How do you give up power effectively when working in collaboration? ​
    – How do you give up power effectively when involving users?​

  • Involving users early in the process allows more relevant solutions to be built​.
  • – Does involving users in the process allow more relevant solutions to be built?​
    – When is it most important to involve users? When is too early/too late?​
    – How do we balance individual needs with the needs of communities/society?​
    – How can we best involve users? / What does a high-quality approach look like? ​
    – How do you co-design user experience? How can we best value their time and expertise? ​

  • You can implement a culture of learning in collaborative project.​
  • – How do you facilitate a culture of learning?​
    – What is a good culture of learning? How do you know if you have one?​

  • Digital solutions can help young people to navigate services more effectively​.
  • – When and why do digital solutions help young people to navigate services?​
    – What norms and behaviour are you encouraging or incentivising over time?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.